From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hao, Xudong" Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxl: passthrough: avoid passing through devices not owned by pciback Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:12:19 +0000 Message-ID: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FCFAE96@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FCF23D7@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FCF3717@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20337.51192.967850.65926@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20337.51192.967850.65926@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Kay, Allen M" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:00 PM > To: Hao, Xudong > Cc: George Dunlap; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com; Kay, Allen M > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: passthrough: avoid passing through > devices not owned by pciback > > Hao, Xudong writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: passthrough: avoid passing > through devices not owned by pciback"): > > We did not see any Intel pci device need quirk in libxl till now, so maybe no > plan for libxl pci-quirks support for the 4.2 release. > > OK. The rest of the patch looks sensible (although the code formatting isn't > ideal). > Ian, Do you want me to rewrite a patch with correct code formatting, or check this patch in? > Ian.