From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hao, Xudong" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/SandyBridge: reserve pages when integrated graphics Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:00:48 +0000 Message-ID: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB4D4B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1363938487-11153-1-git-send-email-xudong.hao@intel.com> <514C3FF802000078000C7B28@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB3A4E@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <515026C502000078000C8030@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB3ED2@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <51502CE302000078000C806E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB4088@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <515059E702000078000C81A8@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB414B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FFB414B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: 'Jan Beulich' Cc: "'keir@xen.org'" , "'xen-devel@lists.xen.org'" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Include page 0x20110000, the five pages are in spec and I have confirmed. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hao, Xudong > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:37 PM > To: Jan Beulich > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; keir@xen.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] xen/SandyBridge: reserve pages when integrated graphics > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:07 PM > > To: Hao, Xudong > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; keir@xen.org > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] xen/SandyBridge: reserve pages when integrated > graphics > > > > >>> On 25.03.13 at 13:39, "Hao, Xudong" wrote: > > >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] > > >> - removal of page 0x20110 > > > > > > Linux kernel has put page 0x20110000 as bad, so we do not need to remove > it > > > from bad page list. > > > Linux commit: a9acc5365dbda29f7be2884efb63771dc24bd815 > > > > So then your earlier response was misleading, or at least confusing > > me: > > > > "I did not get detail spec either, but linux kernel has remove this page > > 0x20110000 already for the same reason, refer to commit: > > a9acc5365dbda29f7be2884efb63771dc24bd815". > > > > "Removed" to me meant removed from the list of bad PFNs. Note > > that I didn't look at the commit, I just took your response as > > confirming that this particular PFN got added to the list in error. > > Sorry to confuse you, the earlier response really a little misleading. Actually I > want to say this page is inaccessible for SandyBridge graphic device. > > > Now that you say that you actually meant the exact opposite, > > we're back at the question why that PFN is in the list in the first > > place, considering that none of the spec updates say so. > > > Let me try to find out the description on spec.