From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 References: <06b65c62-8ca2-0d29-b98d-1a1585141f81@redhat.com> <4968bb3c-cec6-c746-fc2e-7f3754e3711b@assyoma.it> From: Zdenek Kabelac Message-ID: <406ad441-5832-3ad7-fb90-fe775a331785@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:49:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4968bb3c-cec6-c746-fc2e-7f3754e3711b@assyoma.it> Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Why doesn't the lvmcache support the discard (trim) command? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Gionatan Danti , LVM general discussion and development , Ilia Zykov Dne 19. 10. 18 v 11:42 Gionatan Danti napsal(a): > On 19/10/2018 11:12, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: >> And final note - there is upcoming support for accelerating writes with new >> dm-writecache target. > > Hi, should not it be already possible with current dm-cache and writeback > caching? Hi dm-cache targets different goal - new dm-writeback cache has way more optimal write-pattern to accelerate writes - compared even with 'writeback' mode. Another point is - dm-writecache is written with 'NVDIMMs' in mind and it's also simpler. Zdenek