From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Weinstein Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 11:40:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <407490935.792561.1431963648850.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> <792948484.778464.1431962588587.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <555A064C.9070905@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:54404 "EHLO mx3-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751435AbbERPlw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2015 11:41:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <555A064C.9070905@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L Yes issues are specific to hammer. They are found in parts of rados suite, I am wondering if since we incr= eased the amount of tests in it we ever saw them passed.=20 Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- =46rom: "Loic Dachary" To: "Yuri Weinstein" Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 8:33:32 AM Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Hi, On 18/05/2015 17:23, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic >=20 > Thanks for the update. >=20 > There were some issues logged over weekend that were not noted in htt= p://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11661 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11660 Are they specific to hammer ? > environment related: >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11546 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11659 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11662 >=20 > Also, I see rgw latest run with 27 failures http://pulpito.ceph.com/t= euthology-2015-05-12_17:42:50-rgw-hammer-distro-basic-multi/ All of which because of environmental problems: Failed to fetch package version from http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-d= eb-precise-x86_64-notcmalloc/sha1/b69fb89122d6f989152a29124cc7ed54b5e4d= 43b/version Cheers >=20 > I will continue QE validation meanwhile. >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/cep= h/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is= ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph= /commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the= tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 >=20 > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a7= 94ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016= a0021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 >=20 > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com= /issues/11492#QE-Validation >=20 > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on= rgw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd = suite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. >=20 > The other two issues listed as blockers are >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to= hammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue th= at can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html