From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75355C4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C05561B74 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3C05561B74 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFA16E872; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645FC6E52C; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:22 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10057"; a="212462430" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,274,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="212462430" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jul 2021 09:00:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,274,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="498532941" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([10.43.11.63]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2021 09:00:19 -0700 Received: from [10.249.141.251] (mwajdecz-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com [10.249.141.251]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 16RG0I6W017466; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:00:18 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits To: Vinay Belgaumkar , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20210726190800.26762-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> <20210726190800.26762-13-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> From: Michal Wajdeczko Message-ID: <416134fd-d688-1feb-cae3-98bcd287e04c@intel.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:00:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210726190800.26762-13-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" On 26.07.2021 21:07, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure > for range checking while setting min/max frequencies. > > Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes > made from userland. These are initially set to platform min > and max. > > v2: Address review comments (Michal W) > v3: Formatting (Michal W) > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 11 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 + > 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > index c79dba60b2e6..a98cbf274862 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > return err; > } > > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0; > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0; > + > return err; > } > > @@ -124,6 +127,18 @@ static int guc_action_slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id, u32 value) > return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret; > } > > +static int guc_action_slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id) > +{ > + u32 request[] = { > + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST, > + SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_PARAMETER_UNSET, 2), > + id, > + }; > + > + return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request)); > +} > + > + > static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > { > return (slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING); > @@ -170,6 +185,16 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value) > return guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value); > } > > +static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, > + u8 id) > +{ > + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc); > + > + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_PARAM); > + > + return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id); > +} > + > static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state) > { > const char *str = NULL; > @@ -406,6 +431,55 @@ void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt) > GEN6_PMINTRMSK, pm_intrmsk_mbz, 0); > } > > +static int intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) nit: "intel_" prefix not needed for static function > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* Softlimits are initially equivalent to platform limits > + * unless they have deviated from defaults, in which case, > + * we retain the values and set min/max accordingly. > + */ fix style for multi-line comment > + if (!slpc->max_freq_softlimit) > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = slpc->rp0_freq; > + else if (slpc->max_freq_softlimit != slpc->rp0_freq) > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit); > + > + if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit) > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq; > + else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool ignore) > +{ > + if (ignore) { > + /* A failure here does not affect the algorithm in a fatal way */ is this comment just for "ignore" case or whole function ? (as you don't check for errors in "else" case anyway) > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY, > + ignore); > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > + slpc->min_freq); > + } else { > + slpc_unset_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY); > + slpc_unset_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ); > + } > +} > + > +static void intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > +{ > + /* Force slpc to used platform rp0 */ s/slpc/SLPC > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > + slpc->rp0_freq); hmm, likely indent is wrong, did you run checkpatch.pl ? > +} > + > /* > * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC > * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc. > @@ -423,6 +497,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > { > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc); > struct slpc_shared_data *data; > + u32 rp_state_cap; > int ret; > > GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma); > @@ -460,6 +535,28 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc), > slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc)); > > + rp_state_cap = intel_uncore_read(i915->gt.uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); shouldn't this be slpc_to_gt()->uncore ? > + > + slpc->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; > + slpc->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP1_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; > + slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; maybe worth to move "rp" read/parse to small helper function ? > + > + /* Ignore efficient freq and set min/max to platform min/max */ > + intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true); > + intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc); > + > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(slpc); > + if (ret) > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n", > + ERR_PTR(ret)); > + > + drm_info(&i915->drm, > + "Platform fused frequency values - min: %u Mhz, max: %u Mhz\n", > + slpc->min_freq, > + slpc->rp0_freq); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > index f14f81821a51..16dec703db43 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > @@ -6,11 +6,22 @@ > #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_ > #define _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_ > > +#include > + > #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5 > > struct intel_guc_slpc { > struct i915_vma *vma; > struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr; > + > + /* platform frequency limits */ > + u32 min_freq; > + u32 rp0_freq; > + u32 rp1_freq; > + > + /* frequency softlimits */ > + u32 min_freq_softlimit; > + u32 max_freq_softlimit; all frequencies are from 0Hz to 4GHz ? or different units/range ? Thanks, Michal > }; > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 5603377e06ca..f3a445f79a36 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -4109,6 +4109,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg) > #define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070) > #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994) > #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998) > +#define RP0_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0) > +#define RP1_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 8) > +#define RPN_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 16) > #define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(0x138170) > #define GEN9_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(0x138148) > > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204E5C4338F for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D557F61B74 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D557F61B74 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C27C6E52C; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645FC6E52C; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 16:00:22 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10057"; a="212462430" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,274,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="212462430" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jul 2021 09:00:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,274,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="498532941" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([10.43.11.63]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2021 09:00:19 -0700 Received: from [10.249.141.251] (mwajdecz-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com [10.249.141.251]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id 16RG0I6W017466; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:00:18 +0100 To: Vinay Belgaumkar , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20210726190800.26762-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> <20210726190800.26762-13-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> From: Michal Wajdeczko Message-ID: <416134fd-d688-1feb-cae3-98bcd287e04c@intel.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 18:00:18 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210726190800.26762-13-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 26.07.2021 21:07, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Cache rp0, rp1 and rpn platform limits into SLPC structure > for range checking while setting min/max frequencies. > > Also add "soft" limits which keep track of frequency changes > made from userland. These are initially set to platform min > and max. > > v2: Address review comments (Michal W) > v3: Formatting (Michal W) > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h | 11 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 + > 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > index c79dba60b2e6..a98cbf274862 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ static int slpc_shared_data_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > return err; > } > > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0; > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0; > + > return err; > } > > @@ -124,6 +127,18 @@ static int guc_action_slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id, u32 value) > return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret; > } > > +static int guc_action_slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc *guc, u8 id) > +{ > + u32 request[] = { > + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST, > + SLPC_EVENT(SLPC_EVENT_PARAMETER_UNSET, 2), > + id, > + }; > + > + return intel_guc_send(guc, request, ARRAY_SIZE(request)); > +} > + > + > static bool slpc_is_running(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > { > return (slpc_get_state(slpc) == SLPC_GLOBAL_STATE_RUNNING); > @@ -170,6 +185,16 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value) > return guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value); > } > > +static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, > + u8 id) > +{ > + struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc); > + > + GEM_BUG_ON(id >= SLPC_MAX_PARAM); > + > + return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id); > +} > + > static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state) > { > const char *str = NULL; > @@ -406,6 +431,55 @@ void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt) > GEN6_PMINTRMSK, pm_intrmsk_mbz, 0); > } > > +static int intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) nit: "intel_" prefix not needed for static function > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* Softlimits are initially equivalent to platform limits > + * unless they have deviated from defaults, in which case, > + * we retain the values and set min/max accordingly. > + */ fix style for multi-line comment > + if (!slpc->max_freq_softlimit) > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit = slpc->rp0_freq; > + else if (slpc->max_freq_softlimit != slpc->rp0_freq) > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, > + slpc->max_freq_softlimit); > + > + if (!slpc->min_freq_softlimit) > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit = slpc->min_freq; > + else if (slpc->min_freq_softlimit != slpc->min_freq) > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, > + slpc->min_freq_softlimit); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static void intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, bool ignore) > +{ > + if (ignore) { > + /* A failure here does not affect the algorithm in a fatal way */ is this comment just for "ignore" case or whole function ? (as you don't check for errors in "else" case anyway) > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY, > + ignore); > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > + slpc->min_freq); > + } else { > + slpc_unset_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_IGNORE_EFFICIENT_FREQUENCY); > + slpc_unset_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ); > + } > +} > + > +static void intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > +{ > + /* Force slpc to used platform rp0 */ s/slpc/SLPC > + slpc_set_param(slpc, > + SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MAX_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, > + slpc->rp0_freq); hmm, likely indent is wrong, did you run checkpatch.pl ? > +} > + > /* > * intel_guc_slpc_enable() - Start SLPC > * @slpc: pointer to intel_guc_slpc. > @@ -423,6 +497,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > { > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc); > struct slpc_shared_data *data; > + u32 rp_state_cap; > int ret; > > GEM_BUG_ON(!slpc->vma); > @@ -460,6 +535,28 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) > slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc), > slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc)); > > + rp_state_cap = intel_uncore_read(i915->gt.uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); shouldn't this be slpc_to_gt()->uncore ? > + > + slpc->rp0_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP0_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; > + slpc->rp1_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RP1_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; > + slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) * > + GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER; maybe worth to move "rp" read/parse to small helper function ? > + > + /* Ignore efficient freq and set min/max to platform min/max */ > + intel_guc_slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true); > + intel_guc_slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc); > + > + ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_softlimits(slpc); > + if (ret) > + drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n", > + ERR_PTR(ret)); > + > + drm_info(&i915->drm, > + "Platform fused frequency values - min: %u Mhz, max: %u Mhz\n", > + slpc->min_freq, > + slpc->rp0_freq); > > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > index f14f81821a51..16dec703db43 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h > @@ -6,11 +6,22 @@ > #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_ > #define _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_ > > +#include > + > #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5 > > struct intel_guc_slpc { > struct i915_vma *vma; > struct slpc_shared_data *vaddr; > + > + /* platform frequency limits */ > + u32 min_freq; > + u32 rp0_freq; > + u32 rp1_freq; > + > + /* frequency softlimits */ > + u32 min_freq_softlimit; > + u32 max_freq_softlimit; all frequencies are from 0Hz to 4GHz ? or different units/range ? Thanks, Michal > }; > > #endif > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 5603377e06ca..f3a445f79a36 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -4109,6 +4109,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg) > #define BXT_GT_PERF_STATUS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x7070) > #define GEN6_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5994) > #define GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5998) > +#define RP0_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(7, 0) > +#define RP1_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 8) > +#define RPN_CAP_MASK REG_GENMASK(23, 16) > #define BXT_RP_STATE_CAP _MMIO(0x138170) > #define GEN9_RP_STATE_LIMITS _MMIO(0x138148) > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx