From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:41:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from adsl-68-124-224-226.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([IPv6:::ffff:68.124.224.226]:64780 "EHLO goobz.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 00:41:29 +0100 Received: from [10.2.2.70] (adsl-63-194-214-47.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.194.214.47]) by goobz.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i9ANfNu18318; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:41:23 -0700 Message-ID: <4169C89A.8000705@embeddedalley.com> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:41:14 -0700 From: Pete Popov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Porter CC: Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" Subject: Re: PATCH References: <1097428659.4627.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041010123305.A23745@home.com> In-Reply-To: <20041010123305.A23745@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6003 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ppopov@embeddedalley.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips > To answer Pete's original question, I would suggest posting the patch > to http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia which is > where PCMCIA subsystem development conversations are taking place. It > might be good to cc: rmk since he's been the de facto PCMCIA > maintainer. Or, we'll go with your idea we just discussed :) No need for the 64 bit pcmcia patch in that case. I'll make the updates in the next few hours and test them. Pete