All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Cc: SELinux <SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov>, Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Subject: Re: Adding alternate root patch to restorecon (setfiles?)
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:11:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41742383.500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098129355.27895.224.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>

Stephen Smalley wrote:

>On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 15:31, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>  
>
>>We are beginning to look into how we could support clusters with SELinux. 
>>Usually in clusters you move your configuration off on to some shared 
>>storage.
>>
>>So you might do a cp -a  /var/named /shared/var/named
>>
>>We need some way of relabeling these directories with file context.  My 
>>idea is to add an alternate
>>root qualifier to restorecon
>>
>>So in the above example you would do a
>>
>>restorecon -R -p /shared /shared/var/named
>>
>>I think this would work fairly well for chroot environments also.
>>    
>>
>
>setfiles already has such an option (-r).  setfiles and restorecon
>increasingly resemble one another except in their default behaviors.
>
>Previously, you indicated that you viewed the important difference as
>being that setfiles takes a specified file_contexts while restorecon
>only uses the system one, thereby imposing different trust burdens on
>the caller.  But note that setfiles policy already limits the set of
>types that it can read, and this could possibly be pruned further to
>avoid any types writable by a less trusted caller if there are such
>types.
>
>Merging them into one program and re-visiting whether setfiles can
>leverage matchpathcon(3) might be worthwhile.  At present, it doesn't do
>so because it wants the spec info for use in conflict detection, IIRC.
>
>  
>
I agree.  A couple of things in merging them would be to eliminate the 
need to specify the file_context file.  It should
be figured out directly.  Maybe convert restorecon into a wrapper around 
setfiles. 

One other thing we are talking about is the ability to specify 
additional file_contexts file.
Sort of a local_file_context, so that users could override or add 
certain file context without requiring the sources rpm.
users file should also be treated like this.

We need to drive to the point where selinux-policy-*-sources is treated 
like kernel sources.  IE hardly anyone would ever
install sources file.

Dan

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-18 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-18 19:31 Adding alternate root patch to restorecon (setfiles?) Daniel J Walsh
2004-10-18 19:55 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-18 20:11   ` Daniel J Walsh [this message]
2004-10-18 20:51 ` Thomas Bleher
2004-10-19 13:33   ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-10-19 18:36     ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-10-19 18:26       ` Stephen Smalley
2004-10-19 20:27         ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-10-25 15:35       ` Russell Coker
2004-10-25 15:38   ` Russell Coker
2004-10-25 21:31     ` Thomas Bleher
2004-10-26 14:36       ` Russell Coker
2004-11-05 21:39         ` James Carter
2004-11-06  5:23           ` Remaining changes from my patch excluding can_network changes Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-08 17:33             ` Small patch to allow pam_console handle /dev/pmu Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-08 21:21               ` James Carter
2004-11-08 21:21             ` Remaining changes from my patch excluding can_network changes James Carter
2004-11-06  5:33           ` can_network patch Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-09 21:34             ` James Carter
2004-11-09 22:15               ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-06 10:40           ` Adding alternate root patch to restorecon (setfiles?) Thomas Bleher
2004-11-10 23:11           ` Patches without the can_network patch Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-10 23:38             ` Thomas Bleher
2004-11-17 20:15             ` James Carter
2004-11-18 14:32               ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-18 19:43                 ` Thomas Bleher
2004-11-18 19:50                   ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-18 19:59                     ` Thomas Bleher
2004-11-19 22:05                 ` James Carter
2004-11-18 14:33               ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-23 18:52                 ` James Carter
2004-11-23 19:06                   ` Stephen Smalley
2004-11-23 19:37                     ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-23 20:07                       ` Stephen Smalley
2004-11-25 19:40                         ` Russell Coker
2004-11-26 11:55                           ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-24 16:22                   ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-24 16:39                     ` Stephen Smalley
2004-11-24 16:54                       ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-10 15:43                         ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-10 17:06                           ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-10 17:10                             ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-10 18:01                               ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-10 18:02                                 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-10 18:13                                   ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-10 18:11                                 ` Russell Coker
2004-12-10 19:11                                   ` Thomas Bleher
2004-12-10 20:23                                     ` James Carter
2004-12-10 21:39                                     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-12-13 12:18                                       ` David Caplan
2004-12-10 21:01                                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-12-10 23:47                                     ` Russell Coker
2004-11-24 19:48                     ` James Carter
2004-11-24 20:24                       ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-11-30 21:19                       ` Reissue previous patch Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-02 13:54                         ` James Carter
2004-12-02 14:16                           ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-02 15:51                             ` Stephen Smalley
2004-12-02 18:35                               ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-02 17:51                             ` James Carter
2004-12-02 19:27                               ` Latest patch Daniel J Walsh
2004-12-03 13:40                                 ` James Carter
2004-11-17 23:35             ` Patches without the can_network patch Kodungallur Varma
2004-10-18 19:36 Adding alternate root patch to restorecon (setfiles?) Daniel J Walsh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41742383.500@redhat.com \
    --to=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=russell@coker.com.au \
    --cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.