From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfJD7-0003vH-RK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:36:02 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfJD5-0003t0-6q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:35:59 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfJD5-0003sx-36
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:35:59 -0500
Received: from [216.58.162.138] (helo=netraverse.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (SSLv3:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CfIu6-0004Tq-Oj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:16:22 -0500
Received: from [69.165.224.96] (account lreiter HELO [10.1.0.1])
	by netraverse.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
	with ESMTP-TLS id 3721247 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
	Fri, 17 Dec 2004 06:42:30 -0700
Message-ID: <41C2EA18.6030905@verbmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:15:52 -0500
From: Leo Whitman <whit74@verbmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <200412142142.iBELg2Qa009126@treas.simtreas.ru>
	<41C2C1BA.9000509@simtreas.ru>
In-Reply-To: <41C2C1BA.9000509@simtreas.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Windows 2000 disk full problem during install...
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Vladimir N. Oleynik wrote:

> O my God!
> This problem consists not in these flags, you looked corrections
> to the previous version of the ide emulator.
> I have made new hack specially for elimination of a Subject problem only.

And it works as expected - thank you.

> This correction adds waiting one (or zero, autorandomly) period before
> sending interruption after positioning before write. (see attach)
> But this a HACK, do not use after w2k install!

Can you explain why we shouldn't use this other than for win2k install?  
I'm not too familiar with the IDE emulation and am not sure what the 
consequences would be.  Of course, it is easy to disable at run time by 
just setting s->ide_set_irq_from_timer = 0.  I am just trying to 
understand more about this - what the real problem seems to be, what the 
danger of using this hack after install is, etc.

> Me other idea interested - to make asynchronous input-output.
> The received effect of elimination of a Subject problem was
> completely unexpected.

I will investigate your AIO solution as well - do you feel that it is 
more correct than this non-AIO patch?

> <snip>
>
Thank you,

Leo Whitman