From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261940AbULQRPH (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:15:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262078AbULQRPG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:15:06 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20905 "EHLO fire-1.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261940AbULQRO4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 12:14:56 -0500 Message-ID: <41C31215.4040105@osdl.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:06:29 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Organization: OSDL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Vrabel CC: Guillaume Thouvenin , lkml , Andrew Morton , elsa-announce , elsa-devel , Gerrit Huizenga , Jean Pierre Dion , "lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [RFC] fork historic module References: <1103295512.7329.75.camel@frecb000711.frec.bull.fr> <41C2FA3F.4030406@cantab.net> In-Reply-To: <41C2FA3F.4030406@cantab.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Vrabel wrote: > Guillaume Thouvenin wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Here is the fork historic module. This module keeps the historic about > > > Shouldn't it be "history" (noun) instead of "historic" (adjective)? It's > kinda confusing as is. Yes, there are several typo-like corrections needed in the Help text also, if this is merged... -- ~Randy