On 19/08/2021 16:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> On 19/08/2021 16:02, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> The NCI device is a child of an i2c device.
>> If the i2c layer uses runtime PM the power to
>> the NFC device can be cut whenever the i2c
>> layer is done transmitting data to the NFC
>> device.
>> Under these conditions NFC can not work, as
>> it needs power to wait for reception of packets.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> However this
> is unparseable.
> Please wrap commit
> message around 75th character:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.13/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L124
> 
> The subject prefix: "nfc: nxp-nci: "
> 
> Please also Cc all people and lists. You missed here netdev
> and linux-kernel, so this cannot be applied.
> 
>>
>> The necessary extension of runtime PM
>> to the NFC device requires that it
>> be activated as a child of the i2c device.
>> It is not necessary to do any runtime PM
>> operations. This will disable runtime PM
>> for this branch of the tree, but otherwise
>> the NFC device is inoperable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
>> index 94f7f6d9cbad..dba78a5d217a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nxp-nci/i2c.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/nfc.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>  
>> @@ -261,6 +262,7 @@ static int nxp_nci_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>  {
>>  	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>>  	struct nxp_nci_i2c_phy *phy;
>> +	struct nfc_dev *ndev;
>>  	int r;
>>  
>>  	if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
>> @@ -297,6 +299,11 @@ static int nxp_nci_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>  	if (r < 0)
>>  		return r;
>>  
>> +	ndev = phy->ndev->nfc_dev;
>> +	pm_runtime_set_active(&ndev->dev);
>> +	pm_runtime_enable(&ndev->dev);
>> +	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&ndev->dev);
> 
> Setting PM for someone else does not look correct. This breaks
> encapsulation and separation of these files. The NCI device
> (nxp_nci_probe() and other parts of core.c) should instead manage
> it's own runtime PM.
> 

Except this, the code is really weird... there is no runtime PM in the
drivers but this enables it. For what purpose? It also marks it as last
busy but there is no autosuspend. I think I missed entirely the purpose
of this code.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
Linux-nfc mailing list -- linux-nfc@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nfc-leave@lists.01.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s