From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: ✗ patchtest: failure for security_flags.inc: Remove `-fstack-protector-strong' from LDFLAGS
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 22:12:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41ce1477-9f73-044c-4f17-0da752573c81@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180903140259.13841.87444@do.openembedded.org>
On 2018年09月03日 22:02, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: security_flags.inc: Remove `-fstack-protector-strong' from LDFLAGS
> Revision: 1
> URL : https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/13868/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
>
> Thank you for submitting this patch series to OpenEmbedded Core. This is
> an automated response. Several tests have been executed on the proposed
> series by patchtest resulting in the following failures:
>
>
>
> * Issue Series does not apply on top of target branch [test_series_merge_on_head]
The patch is based on `0ed4a62 security_flags.inc: add
var-SECURITY_STACK_PROTECTOR to improve variable OVERRIDES'
which is on master-next
//Hongxu
> Suggested fix Rebase your series on top of targeted branch
> Targeted branch master (currently at 853e0499be)
>
>
>
> If you believe any of these test results are incorrect, please reply to the
> mailing list (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org) raising your concerns.
> Otherwise we would appreciate you correcting the issues and submitting a new
> version of the patchset if applicable. Please ensure you add/increment the
> version number when sending the new version (i.e. [PATCH] -> [PATCH v2] ->
> [PATCH v3] -> ...).
>
> ---
> Guidelines: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
> Test framework: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest
> Test suite: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/patchtest-oe
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-03 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-03 13:31 [PATCH] security_flags.inc: Remove `-fstack-protector-strong' from LDFLAGS Hongxu Jia
2018-09-03 14:02 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for " Patchwork
2018-09-03 14:12 ` Hongxu Jia [this message]
2018-09-03 16:30 ` [PATCH] " Khem Raj
2018-09-04 1:35 ` Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41ce1477-9f73-044c-4f17-0da752573c81@windriver.com \
--to=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.