From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755798AbdETB42 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 21:56:28 -0400 Received: from mail05-md.ns.itscom.net ([175.177.155.115]:39094 "EHLO mail05-md.ns.itscom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755640AbdETB41 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 May 2017 21:56:27 -0400 From: "J. R. Okajima" Subject: Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers To: Joonas Lahtinen , Andrea Arcangeli , chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, jani.nikula@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <17413.1494026939@jrobl> References: <7743.1493532478@jrobl> <20170430094348.GA5970@redhat.com> <16988.1493604328@jrobl> <1493977180.3551.24.camel@linux.intel.com> <17413.1494026939@jrobl> Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 10:56:25 +0900 Message-ID: <4234.1495245385@jrobl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "J. R. Okajima": > I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your > fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other > people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the > problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier > to reproduce the problem. > Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to > wait for my test. Release it soon for other people. Now I am going to able to run my local test. But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0. Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and the other of v4.12-rcN? J. R. Okajima