From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Perry Subject: Re: Bitkeeper Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:34:08 -0700 Message-ID: <42594770.8010805@speakeasy.net> References: <1112911404.7186.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4255B1B7.2030403@diku.dk> <4255C1B7.6050509@tupshin.com> <20050407235521.GC29680@us.ibm.com> <4255CE7B.8050300@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4255CE7B.8050300@diku.dk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote: > > The advantage to the more manual approach is that you can track renames, > but you can probably do that with darcs as well. From what I have heard, > the main problem with darcs is that is uses lots of memory when > operating on big trees, and that it is a bit slow due to having been > written in Haskell. It does seem simpler to use than TLA/Arch however, > but Bazaar tries to address that (though I don't think this is an issue > once you get used to TLA.) > Haskell is a bit slower, but the real culprit is design related. The author and crew are working on it. Should be cleared up eventually.