All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chenxiaosong (A)" <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dhowells@redhat.com>, <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19,v2] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 18:38:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429d87b0-3a53-052a-a304-0afa8d51900d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWawy0J9JfStEku0@kroah.com>

在 2021/10/13 18:11, Greg KH 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 05:51:01PM +0800, ChenXiaoSong wrote:
>> If two processes mount same superblock, memory leak occurs:
>>
>> CPU0               |  CPU1
>> do_new_mount       |  do_new_mount
>>    fs_set_subtype   |    fs_set_subtype
>>      kstrdup        |
>>                     |      kstrdup
>>      memrory leak   |
>>
>> Fix this by adding a write lock while calling fs_set_subtype.
>>
>> Linus's tree already have refactoring patchset [1], one of them can fix this bug:
>>          c30da2e981a7 (fuse: convert to use the new mount API)
>>
>> Since we did not merge the refactoring patchset in this branch, I create this patch.
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-fsdevel/patch/20190903113640.7984-3-mszeredi@redhat.com/
>>
>> Fixes: 79c0b2df79eb (add filesystem subtype support)
>> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v1: Can not mount sshfs ([PATCH linux-4.19.y] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency)
>> v2: Use write lock while writing superblock
>>
>>   fs/namespace.c | 9 ++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> As you are referring to a fuse-only patch above, why are you trying to
> resolve this issue in the core namespace code instead?
> 
> How does fuse have anything to do with this?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h
> .
> 

Now, only `fuse_fs_type` and `fuseblk_fs_type` has `FS_HAS_SUBTYPE` flag 
in kernel code, but maybe there is a filesystem module(`struct 
file_system_type` has `FS_HAS_SUBTYPE` flag). And only mounting fuseblk 
filesystem(e.g. ntfs) will occur memory leak now.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13  9:51 [PATCH 4.19,v2] VFS: Fix fuseblk memory leak caused by mount concurrency ChenXiaoSong
2021-10-13 10:11 ` Greg KH
2021-10-13 10:38   ` chenxiaosong (A) [this message]
2021-10-13 10:49     ` chenxiaosong (A)
2021-10-20 12:30       ` Greg KH
2021-10-26  2:18         ` chenxiaosong (A)
2021-10-26  5:45           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429d87b0-3a53-052a-a304-0afa8d51900d@huawei.com \
    --to=chenxiaosong2@huawei.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.