From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262737AbVFWVmE (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:42:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262761AbVFWVjP (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:39:15 -0400 Received: from [12.172.143.34] ([12.172.143.34]:26305 "EHLO mail.teleformix.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262816AbVFWVhe (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:37:34 -0400 Message-ID: <42BB2B51.5030604@teleformix.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:36:17 -0500 From: Dan Oglesby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avuton Olrich CC: Adrian Ulrich , Horst von Brand , ninja@slaphack.com, reiser@namesys.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <42BAC304.2060802@slaphack.com> <200506231924.j5NJOvLA031008@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <20050623221222.33074838.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <3aa654a405062314296a4ca2ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aa654a405062314296a4ca2ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.2, Antispam-Data: 2005.6.8.46 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Avuton Olrich wrote: > On 6/23/05, Adrian Ulrich wrote: > >>>From my POV: >> I've been using Reiser4 for almost everything (Rootfs / External >> Harddrives) for about ~8 Months without any data loss.. >> >> Powerloss, unpluging the Disk while writing, full filesystem, >> heavy use : No problems with reiser4.. It *is* stable. > > > *From users who use it* I have heard nothing but love for reiser4. > It's amazing how quickly people seem to be dismissive about what > reiser4 has to offer when they more than likely haven't taken it for a > spin at all. All I hear about is 'we can't let something ugly go into > the stable kernel' then in the same day I looked into some of the > config options... > > CONFIG_WDC_ALI15X3: > *snip* > This allows for UltraDMA support for WDC drives that ignore CRC > checking. You are a fool for enabling this option, but there have been > requests. > *snip* > > How many have requested that reiser4 make it into the kernel? I'd > imagine many more then requested this IDE feature. And it's an > *option*. Please work something out on this. > > avuton > As a user who uses ReiserFS v3, I have nothing but love for ReiserFS. The speed and reliability are great right now, I'm really looking forward to using ReiserFS v4. --Dan