From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262928AbVFXABz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:01:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262881AbVFXABq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:01:46 -0400 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:30425 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262919AbVFWX6P (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:58:15 -0400 Message-ID: <42BB4C81.6070500@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:57:53 -0700 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Dreher , vitaly@thebsh.namesys.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Ulrich , Horst von Brand , ninja@slaphack.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins References: <42BAC304.2060802@slaphack.com> <200506231924.j5NJOvLA031008@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <20050623221222.33074838.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch> <200506232249.47302.michael.dreher@uni-konstanz.de> In-Reply-To: <200506232249.47302.michael.dreher@uni-konstanz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org One, you were using V3 not V4. Two, this bug you mention is probably not an fs bug. rm first creates a list of names, and then removes them. reiser@linux:~/scratch> touch fufu reiser@linux:~/scratch> touch fifu reiser@linux:~/scratch> rm *fu fi* rm: cannot remove `fifu': No such file or directory Your file either somehow got removed before rm got to it, or rm somehow got to it twice. Vitaly, can you look at the error handling by rm and see if it can get to things twice when it hits an error or if you can otherwise figure this out? If I remember right, I have hit this myself for non-reiserfs filesystems, and I never investigated it. Michael Dreher wrote: >>>> Not everyone will want >>>>to reformat at once, but as the reiser4 code matures and proves itself >>>>(even more than it already has), >>>> >>>> >>>I for one have seen mainly people with wild claims that it will make >>>their machines much faster, and coming back later asking how they can >>>recover their thrashed partitions... >>> >>> >>Then please show us some Links/Message-IDs to such postings. >>I'd like to read them. >> >> > >Here you are.... > >The following happened to me with reiserfs as it was shipped with >suse 9.1: > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >dreher@euler03:~/mytex/konstanz/wohnung> ls >auto makler2.aux makler2.log makler2.tex makler.aux makler.log >swk.eps unilogo.eps >briefkpf.tex makler2.dvi makler2.ps makler3.tex makler.dvi makler.tex >unikopf.tex >dreher@euler03:~/mytex/konstanz/wohnung> rm *.aux *.log >rm: cannot remove `makler2.log': No such file or directory >dreher@euler03:~/mytex/konstanz/wohnung> ls >auto briefkpf.tex makler2.dvi makler2.ps makler2.tex makler3.tex >makler.dvi makler.tex swk.eps unikopf.tex unilogo.eps >dreher@euler03:~/mytex/konstanz/wohnung> uname -a >Linux euler03 2.6.5-7.108-smp #1 SMP Wed Aug 25 13:34:40 UTC 2004 i686 i686 >i386 GNU/Linux >dreher@euler03:~/mytex/konstanz/wohnung> date >Tue Sep 21 13:15:45 CEST 2004 >---------------------------------------------------------- > >Note the line "rm: cannot remove `makler2.log': No such file or directory" > >There was no data loss, but such a bug should not happen. >I never had similar experiences with ext3. > >Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce this behavior. > > > >> Powerloss, unpluging the Disk while writing, full filesystem, >> heavy use : No problems with reiser4.. It *is* stable. >> >> > >My impression: reiser3 is not 100% stable, but quite stable, >written by someone who asks for "review by benchmark". > >Michael > > > >