From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dlrta-0005M2-0V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:23:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DlrtT-0005I6-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:23:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DlrtS-00059V-QI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:23:06 -0400 Received: from [65.254.53.84] (helo=smtp.astolat-it.co.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dlrse-00053P-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:22:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.6.2] (timdw.plus.com [84.92.164.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.astolat-it.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4311912D2283 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:18:34 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <42BC4084.5000304@astolat-it.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:19:00 +0100 From: Tim Walker MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Build environment image References: <20050621042844.GA13691@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <002001c5767e$818808a0$334d21d1@organiza3bfb0e> <20050621194553.GA3898@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <42B87961.4080206@astolat-it.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <42B87961.4080206@astolat-it.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some feedback would be appreciated. Cheers, Tim Tim Walker wrote: > How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build > environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image? > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel >