From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FCDC67863 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91A882064E for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:04:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 91A882064E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42dsYs4bswzF1cK for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:04:17 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42drzx1x3yzDrVP for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:38:21 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 42drzx1MTsz9sD3; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:38:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 42drzx12rGz9sDC; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:38:21 +1100 (AEDT) X-powerpc-patch-notification: thanks X-powerpc-patch-commit: 22a3d03d69dfd3bfc606d1996969820d619b7c27 In-Reply-To: <20181015120143.1248-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [1/2] powerpc/uapi: Fix sigcontext definition to use user_pt_regs Message-Id: <42drzx12rGz9sDC@ozlabs.org> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:38:20 +1100 (AEDT) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 12:01:42 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > My recent patch to split pt_regs between user and kernel missed > the usage in struct sigcontext. > > Because this is a user visible struct it should be using the user > visible definition, which when we're building for the kernel is called > struct user_pt_regs. > > As far as I can see this hasn't actually caused a bug (yet), because > we don't use the sizeof() the sigcontext->regs anywhere. But we should > still fix it to avoid confusion and future bugs. > > Fixes: 002af9391bfb ("powerpc: Split user/kernel definitions of struct pt_regs") > Reported-by: Madhavan Srinivasan > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Series applied to powerpc next. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/22a3d03d69dfd3bfc606d199696982 cheers