From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Vt-0003K7-7q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:23:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Vq-0007WX-3i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:23:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ds9Vp-0007Vz-UE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 11:23:38 -0400 References: <20170913132417.24384-1-david@redhat.com> <20170913132417.24384-9-david@redhat.com> <20170913172115.1b7fb95d.cohuck@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <42ef2f55-aced-077e-00d5-35b444fd5653@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:23:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170913172115.1b7fb95d.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 08/22] s390x: move sclp_service_call() to sclp.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck , Thomas Huth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , borntraeger@de.ibm.com, Alexander Graf , Eduardo Habkost , Matthew Rosato , Paolo Bonzini , Markus Armbruster , Igor Mammedov On 13.09.2017 17:21, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:29:23 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: > >> On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. >>> Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of struct CPUS390XState to >>> fix the two sclp consoles complaining. >> >> Is that sentence about the forward declaration still valid? I did not >> see that anymore here... > > Indeed. I can fix this up to: > > "Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. > Also adjust some includes." > > ? You know how to use just the right words ;) Thanks! -- Thanks, David