From: "Chen, Jing D" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] implement new Rx checksum flag
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:41:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3A2EA632@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473125252-32201-1-git-send-email-xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Xiao W
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 9:27 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Chen, Jing D <jing.d.chen@intel.com>; olivier.matz@6wind.com; Wang, Xiao W
> <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] implement new Rx checksum flag
>
> v2:
> * Removed hw_ip_checksum check in fm10k_rx_vec_condition_check().
>
> * Defined CKSUM_SHIFT for SSE bits shift.
>
> * Changed commit title from "add back Rx checksum offload" to
> "fix Rx checksum flags".
>
> * Added new cksum flag support for ixgbe vector Rx, based on patch
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14630/) which came earlier.
>
> v1:
> Following http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14941/, this patch set
> implements newly defined Rx checksum flag for igb, ixgbe, i40e and fm10k.
>
> Currently, ixgbe and fm10k support Rx checksum offload in both scalar
> and vector datapath, while the other two don't, this patch set keeps
> this situation.
>
> Note: This patch set has dependency on the following patches:
>
> "mbuf: add new Rx checksum mbuf flags"
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14941/)
>
> "ixgbe: support checksum flags in sse vector Rx function"
> (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/14630/)
>
> Xiao Wang (5):
> net/fm10k: fix Rx checksum flags
> net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/e1000: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/ixgbe: implement new Rx checksum flag
> net/i40e: implement new Rx checksum flag
>
> drivers/net/e1000/igb_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_sse.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 6 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Acked-by : Jing Chen <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 1:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] implement new Rx checksum flag Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] net/fm10k: fix Rx checksum flags Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] net/fm10k: implement new Rx checksum flag Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net/e1000: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] net/ixgbe: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-06 1:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] net/i40e: " Xiao Wang
2016-09-14 5:41 ` Chen, Jing D [this message]
2016-10-13 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3A2EA632@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.