From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Jing D" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/29] Support VFD and DPDK PF + kernel VF on i40e Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:39:29 +0000 Message-ID: <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C5B8459@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20161216143919.4909-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <5846f66b-9a83-faa6-3de1-c7ae12236201@6wind.com> <4341B239C0EFF9468EE453F9E9F4604D3C5B7FE2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <7801511.7yxptAly8J@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Vincent JARDIN , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Zhang, Helin" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876E0F951 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:39:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <7801511.7yxptAly8J@xps13> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:21 PM > To: Chen, Jing D > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Vincent JARDIN ; Yigit, Ferru= h > ; Wu, Jingjing ; Zhang, He= lin > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/29] Support VFD and DPDK PF + kernel > VF on i40e >=20 > 2016-12-19 09:01, Chen, Jing D: > > Since then, both Linux and DPDK keep developing code. Then, we found > > it's necessary to extend VF capability (Like promiscuous mode). It > > will be hard to ask Linux PF to support that service considering upstre= am > effort in Linux world. >=20 > Please, could you clarify this? > Do you mean you cannot change the Linux driver? There are 2 things here. One is to add extended functionality into Linux dr= iver, Another is to have it upstream into kernel world. The first one can be achieved easier, while later one may be difficult. The= y will have concern why VM can have such privilege (like promisc mode). But I need to check as I know there is some mechanism now to make a VM privileged.