All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 22:34:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4390a69e-a297-313d-044d-abf846eff1d1@axentia.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525300581-27217-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu>

On 2018-05-03 00:36, Wenwen Wang wrote:
> In i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), there are two buffers: msgbuf0 and msgbuf1,
> which are used to save a series of messages, as mentioned in the comment.
> According to the value of the variable "size", msgbuf0 is initialized to
> various values. In contrast, msgbuf1 is left uninitialized until the
> function i2c_transfer() is invoked. However, mgsbuf1 is not always
> initialized on all possible execution paths (implementation) of
> i2c_transfer(). Thus, it is possible that mgsbuf1 may still not be

double negation here

> uninitialized even after the invocation of the function i2c_transfer(). In
> the following execution, the uninitialized msgbuf1 will be used, such as
> for security checks. Since uninitialized values can be random and
> arbitrary, this will cause undefined behaviors or even check bypass. For
> example, it is expected that if the value of "size" is
> I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_PROC_CALL, the value of data->block[0] should not be larger
> than I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX. But, at the end of i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(), the
> value read from msgbuf1 is assigned to data->block[0], which can
> potentially lead to invalid block write size, as demonstrated in the error
> message.
> 
> This patch simply initializes the buffer msgbuf1 with 0 to avoid undefined
> behaviors or security issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> index b5aec33..0fcca75 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static s32 i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, u16 addr,
>  	 * somewhat simpler.
>  	 */
>  	unsigned char msgbuf0[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX+3];
> -	unsigned char msgbuf1[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX+2];
> +	unsigned char msgbuf1[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX+2] = {0};

I think this will result in the whole of msgbuf1 being filled with zeroes.
It might be cheaper to do this with code proper rather than with an
initializer?

Cheers,
Peter

>  	int num = read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ ? 2 : 1;
>  	int i;
>  	u8 partial_pec = 0;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-03 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-02 22:36 [PATCH] i2c: core-smbus: fix a potential uninitialization bug Wenwen Wang
2018-05-02 22:36 ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-03 20:34 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2018-05-04  4:08   ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-04  5:04     ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-04  5:28       ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-04  6:49         ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-04  7:17           ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-04  7:27             ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-04 14:59               ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-04 15:38                 ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-05  1:28                   ` Wenwen Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-05  1:43 Wenwen Wang
2018-05-05  1:43 ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-05 10:15 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-05 10:15   ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-05 10:28 ` Peter Rosin
2018-05-05 12:17   ` Wenwen Wang
2018-05-05 11:50 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-05 11:50   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-30  5:53 Wenwen Wang
2018-04-30  5:53 ` Wenwen Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4390a69e-a297-313d-044d-abf846eff1d1@axentia.se \
    --to=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wang6495@umn.edu \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.