Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 16:01 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> [...]
> 
>>Also, if I'm going to be sending patches for these it's obviously a patch
>>per affected file, so if I'm going to be sending let's say a hundred of
>>these patches it's still a mail per patch or do I just archive them
>>somehow and attach them or do I place them on a webserver and mail a uri
>>to them?
> 
> 
> Make one patch per subsystem (unless told otherwise from core LKML
> personnel directly) since
> -) these are trivial patches and
> -) you actually want to mail them to the relevant
>    maintainer/mailing-list and Cc: LKML/k-j only.
> 
> 	Bernd

Ah bugger.  That makes it quite a bit more complex :(.  It's relatively
easy to single out all the cases (and fix them), but automating the
grouping of files into subsystems and assigning maintainers to those
subsystems isn't as trivial.

Thanks.

-- 
There are only 10 kinds of people in this world,
  those that understand binary and those that don't.
http://www.kroon.co.za/