From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Pallipadi,
Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/26] ACPI: Prefer _CST over FADT for C-state capabilities
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:52:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43A9A460.6000300@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B300567E76B@hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
Linus,
Brown, Len wrote:
> yes, the 3rd patch should go with the first two.
> I asked Linus to pull the 3rd patch upstream
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/12/6/32
> but this was just as he cut -rc5 and headed out for a week.
>
> Linus,
> Can you pull that patch upstream before cutting 2.6.15?
This patch still isn't in your tree. Can you please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B300567E76B@hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
2005-12-13 21:48 ` [stable] RE: [patch 10/26] ACPI: Prefer _CST over FADT for C-state capabilities Greg KH
2005-12-21 18:52 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
[not found] <20051213073430.558435000@press.kroah.org>
2005-12-13 8:21 ` [patch 00/26] - stable review Greg KH
2005-12-13 8:22 ` [patch 10/26] ACPI: Prefer _CST over FADT for C-state capabilities Greg KH
2005-12-13 16:00 ` Daniel Drake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43A9A460.6000300@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.