All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:50:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/24/20 6:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>> commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros")
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>>
>> in testcase: will-it-scale
>> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>> with following parameters:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator,
> perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and
> reordering lines may affect this.
> Can you restore terminator there and re-test?
>

I have retested with the change, but it has no effect on the performance.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Gue
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:50:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/24/20 6:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>> commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros")
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>>
>> in testcase: will-it-scale
>> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>> with following parameters:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator,
> perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and
> reordering lines may affect this.
> Can you restore terminator there and re-test?
>

I have retested with the change, but it has no effect on the performance.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkp@lists.01.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:50:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com>



On 3/24/20 6:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>> commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros")
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>>
>> in testcase: will-it-scale
>> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>> with following parameters:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator,
> perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and
> reordering lines may affect this.
> Can you restore terminator there and re-test?
>

I have retested with the change, but it has no effect on the performance.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:50:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeeKZLeZ8E3Py7LECN54SPFHaRgkxrMzBYQWXM8x+4JhA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1068 bytes --]



On 3/24/20 6:24 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:02 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -53.4% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>> commit: 06c4d00466eb374841bc84c39af19b3161ff6917 ("[patch 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros")
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-devicetable-Move-x86-specific-macro-out-of-generic-code/20200321-031729
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>>
>> in testcase: will-it-scale
>> on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz with 8G memory
>> with following parameters:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c change missed the terminator,
> perhaps it's a culprit, because I don't believe removing dups and
> reordering lines may affect this.
> Can you restore terminator there and re-test?
>

I have retested with the change, but it has no effect on the performance.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-25  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 13:13 [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 01/22] x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:27     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Add consistent " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 03/22] x86/cpu/bugs: Convert to new matching macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 04/22] x86/perf/events: Convert to new CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 05/22] x86/kvm: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 06/22] x86/kernel: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 07/22] x86/platform: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:47     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:47     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:32       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:32       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 16:38       ` mark gross
2020-03-23 16:38         ` mark gross
2020-03-23 16:38         ` mark gross
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 09/22] cpufreq: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:50   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 21:52       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 21:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 21:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 22:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 22:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 22:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  6:01   ` [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24 10:24     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 15:38       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-25  7:51         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50       ` Rong Chen [this message]
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25 10:32         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26  8:33           ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-25 12:41     ` [tip: x86/cpu] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Fix wrong macro conversion tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51   ` [patch V2 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 15:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 15:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 22:32     ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 10/22] EDAC: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 19:31   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 19:31     ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 19:31     ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 11/22] platform/x86: Convert to new " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 12/22] hwmon: Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 13/22] thermal: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 14/22] extcon: axp288: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 15/22] intel_idle: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 16/22] mmc: sdhci-acpi: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 17/22] PCI: intel-mid: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 18/22] powercap/intel_rapl: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 19/22] ASoC: Intel: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 20/22] crypto: Convert to new " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 21/22] hwrng: via_rng - Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] hwrng: via_rng: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 22/22] x86/cpu: Cleanup the now unused " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:31 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-20 14:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-20 14:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-24 18:58 ` [PATCH 23/22] x86/smpboot: Remove the last ICPU() macro Borislav Petkov
2020-03-24 18:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-24 18:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-13  8:40   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43a4189a-7153-18e8-4657-4a4400002c05@intel.com \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.