From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752394Ab0CWT1M (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:27:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:41502 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751952Ab0CWT1K convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:27:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=BPBu3xfuwcYwqPOxpjDMeBpFDIoWLNuhxOPotx8rly6fjq1l5qVJTs92BOKVY1xcuN LlXRmbgzFiv37fywKUYsIL7Mad5W65jlwXO6+Vo3sJY6NZsY12trVpqblco2yd6/E1fJ W4OL2XxoaNykTwkHK7pToATYINbtKP/HFxnX4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100319000438.GV5454@kroah.com> References: <20100313001618.GA9811@kroah.com> <20100313001511.285517122@kvm.kroah.org> <43e72e891003151804s617659f8o6dcbf0b5ab63cb5d@mail.gmail.com> <20100319000438.GV5454@kroah.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:26:49 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 33ea0f0f80f654c5 Message-ID: <43e72e891003231226q3be972dfl5bb8a022bdb5aaff@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [stable] [patch 070/123] ath9k: re-enable ps by default for new single chip families To: Greg KH , Senthil Balasubramanian Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" , stable@kernel.org, Kristoffer Ericson , "Justin P. Mattock" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Peter Stuge , stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:04:15PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> > 2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know. >> >> This was intended for 2.6.32 as well. Thanks > > Great, but it didn't apply there, so I didn't try to force it :) > > Care to provide a backport? Senthil, if you get a chance, can you send this backport? Sorry I haven't had a chance yet. Luis