From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F91F6A9 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 13:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726712AbfADNDV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:03:21 -0500 Received: from fed1rmfepo102.cox.net ([68.230.241.144]:38549 "EHLO fed1rmfepo102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726169AbfADNDV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:03:21 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo110.cox.net ([68.230.241.159]) by fed1rmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.28 201-2260-151-171-20160122) with ESMTP id <20190104130320.SPDE12708.fed1rmfepo102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo110.cox.net> for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 08:03:20 -0500 Received: from thunderbird.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thunderbird.smith.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC85B82576; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 06:03:19 -0700 (MST) X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A090211.5C2F5998.0008,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=NZRSKFL4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=BlDZPKRk22kUaIvSBqmi8w==:117 a=BlDZPKRk22kUaIvSBqmi8w==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=3JhidrIBZZsA:10 a=WDhBSedXqNQA:10 a=KxJIi9MXGhmf0OHgJ3sA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=ischis2@cox.net From: Stephen P Smith To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add 'human' date format Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 06:03:18 -0700 Message-ID: <4462659.Bys67ThUBR@thunderbird> Organization: Personal In-Reply-To: <20190104075034.GA26014@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20181231003150.8031-1-ischis2@cox.net> <2637944.PqRbksyA0G@thunderbird> <20190104075034.GA26014@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Friday, January 4, 2019 12:50:35 AM MST Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 06:19:56AM -0700, Stephen P. Smith wrote: > > > > I didn't see anything in the code which would prohibit setting something > > like that. > > Yeah, I don't think supporting that is too hard. I was thinking > something like this: I take it that if I update Linus's patch, I still keep Junio's and Linus' sign-off line for the purpose of the chain of custody? Of should I use a second patch? Just trying to follow the rules. sps