From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6 Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: <446B9456.5030308@gentoo.org> References: <20060517193405.GB17895@tuxdriver.com> <20060517193801.GC17895@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:18938 "EHLO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbWEQVFz (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2006 17:05:55 -0400 To: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, dsd@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060517193801.GC17895@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org John W. Linville wrote: > Daniel Drake: > set_security implementation inside softmac If it's not too late, can you drop this one? I didn't receive any feedback on it, and I decided it's not the right approach. The interface isn't great, but when done at the driver level it allows drivers to reject various security settings that they don't support by not copying them into secinfo. So, even though this code block will be almost duplicated over bcm43xx, zd1211, and more, I think that level is the right place to put it. Thanks, Daniel