From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751073AbWHIPwg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:52:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751076AbWHIPwg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:52:36 -0400 Received: from 63-162-81-179.lisco.net ([63.162.81.179]:35200 "EHLO grunt.slaphack.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751021AbWHIPwf (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:52:35 -0400 Message-ID: <44DA04C1.7040306@slaphack.com> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:52:33 -0400 From: David Masover User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Reiser CC: Pavel Machek , "Horst H. von Brand" , Bernd Schubert , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Jan-Benedict Glaw , Clay Barnes , Rudy Zijlstra , Adrian Ulrich , ipso@snappymail.ca, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion References: <200608011428.k71ESIuv007094@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> <44CF87E6.1050004@slaphack.com> <20060806225912.GC4205@ucw.cz> <44D99ED9.1030003@namesys.com> In-Reply-To: <44D99ED9.1030003@namesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hans Reiser wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >> >> Yes, I'm afraid redundancy/checksums kill write speed, >> > they kill write speed to cache, but not to disk.... our compression > plugin is faster than the uncompressed plugin..... Regarding cache, do we do any sort of consistency checking for RAM, or do we leave that to some of the stranger kernel patches -- or just an occasional memtest?