From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stable-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.80]:50986 "EHLO
        lelnx194.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751093AbeCTJRR (ORCPT
        <rfc822;stable@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:17:17 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix build on multi_v7_defconfig
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
        Milosz Wasilewski <milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org>,
        Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org>
References: <20180320080027.8948-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org>
 <20180320081013.GA12444@kroah.com>
 <CAKaJLVtjD6da=px70f1Dz2TOwf3uh4ux8OLFVbcpntsji-Dqag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Message-ID: <452ee8f2-7b3c-be83-ba5d-f776bb73fcc3@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 11:16:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKaJLVtjD6da=px70f1Dz2TOwf3uh4ux8OLFVbcpntsji-Dqag@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On 20/03/18 10:20, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On 20 March 2018 at 16:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 04:00:24PM +0800, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>>> Recent patches broke build on multi_v7_defconfig (ARM), on
>>> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y branch. The build error as follows:
>>>
>>>      arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c:2243:12: error:
>>>      'HWMOD_CLKDM_NOAUTO' undeclared here (not in a function)
>>>        .flags  = HWMOD_CLKDM_NOAUTO,
>>>                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> I just dropped this patch instead, as is it really worth adding these
>> other patches to resolve this?
>>
> 
> Agree. Those patches are the actual dependency for one that breaks the
> build, but it's kinda an overkill to pull that amount of code. If we
> really need that patch, somebody (maintainers?) should revise it and
> come up with a better solution, providing all needed dependency
> patches and predicting the impact of all series on the system, as this
> is a stable branch.

Yea I don't see why this patch would be so critical to get it fixed in 
stable. If a need rises, we (as in TI) can work on that.

-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki