All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

diff for duplicates of <4532CA63-C71A-41E9-AE91-D685F3692475@linaro.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index f68ea93..7d4bb49 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,33 +1,27 @@
 
-> Il giorno 04 set 2017, alle ore 10:14, Mel Gorman =
-<mgorman@techsingularity.net> ha scritto:
->=20
+> Il giorno 04 set 2017, alle ore 10:14, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> ha scritto:
+> 
 > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
 >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:46:28AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
 >>> [SECOND TAKE, with just the name of one of the tester fixed]
->>>=20
+>>> 
 >>> Hi,
 >>> while testing the read-write unfairness issues reported by Mel, I
 >>> found BFQ failing to guarantee good responsiveness against heavy
 >>> random sync writes in the background, i.e., multiple writers doing
->>> random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused =
-by
+>>> random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused by
 >>> three related bugs, because of which BFQ failed to guarantee to
 >>> high-weight processes the expected fraction of the throughput.
->>>=20
->>=20
->> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a =
-work
+>>> 
+>> 
+>> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a work
 >> in progress. I should know in a few days how things stand.
->>=20
->=20
-> The problems with parallel heavy writers seem to have disappeared with =
-this
-> series. There are still revisions taking place on Ming's to overall =
-setting
-> of legacy vs mq is still a work in progress but this series looks =
-good.
->=20
+>> 
+> 
+> The problems with parallel heavy writers seem to have disappeared with this
+> series. There are still revisions taking place on Ming's to overall setting
+> of legacy vs mq is still a work in progress but this series looks good.
+> 
 
 Great news!
 
@@ -35,7 +29,7 @@ Thanks for testing,
 Paolo
 
 > Thanks.
->=20
-> --=20
+> 
+> -- 
 > Mel Gorman
 > SUSE Labs
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 87606f9..d21a6d5 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -36,35 +36,29 @@
 ]
 [
   "\n",
-  "> Il giorno 04 set 2017, alle ore 10:14, Mel Gorman =\n",
-  "<mgorman\@techsingularity.net> ha scritto:\n",
-  ">=20\n",
+  "> Il giorno 04 set 2017, alle ore 10:14, Mel Gorman <mgorman\@techsingularity.net> ha scritto:\n",
+  "> \n",
   "> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:42:57PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:\n",
   ">> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 08:46:28AM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:\n",
   ">>> [SECOND TAKE, with just the name of one of the tester fixed]\n",
-  ">>>=20\n",
+  ">>> \n",
   ">>> Hi,\n",
   ">>> while testing the read-write unfairness issues reported by Mel, I\n",
   ">>> found BFQ failing to guarantee good responsiveness against heavy\n",
   ">>> random sync writes in the background, i.e., multiple writers doing\n",
-  ">>> random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused =\n",
-  "by\n",
+  ">>> random writes and systematic fdatasync [1]. The failure was caused by\n",
   ">>> three related bugs, because of which BFQ failed to guarantee to\n",
   ">>> high-weight processes the expected fraction of the throughput.\n",
-  ">>>=20\n",
-  ">>=20\n",
-  ">> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a =\n",
-  "work\n",
+  ">>> \n",
+  ">> \n",
+  ">> Queued on top of Ming's most recent series even though that's still a work\n",
   ">> in progress. I should know in a few days how things stand.\n",
-  ">>=20\n",
-  ">=20\n",
-  "> The problems with parallel heavy writers seem to have disappeared with =\n",
-  "this\n",
-  "> series. There are still revisions taking place on Ming's to overall =\n",
-  "setting\n",
-  "> of legacy vs mq is still a work in progress but this series looks =\n",
-  "good.\n",
-  ">=20\n",
+  ">> \n",
+  "> \n",
+  "> The problems with parallel heavy writers seem to have disappeared with this\n",
+  "> series. There are still revisions taking place on Ming's to overall setting\n",
+  "> of legacy vs mq is still a work in progress but this series looks good.\n",
+  "> \n",
   "\n",
   "Great news!\n",
   "\n",
@@ -72,10 +66,10 @@
   "Paolo\n",
   "\n",
   "> Thanks.\n",
-  ">=20\n",
-  "> --=20\n",
+  "> \n",
+  "> -- \n",
   "> Mel Gorman\n",
   "> SUSE Labs"
 ]
 
-68ae4fe0c8fc248f560dfe243df28e7105b40e55092adca11d09e59dbe6da239
+d19e29c8a8924dd8d60e30f92003889d02eb720f60edadd10fcb0329ef063b66
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.