From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [git patches] libata fixes Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:06:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4549447D.5010500@garzik.org> References: <20061101021301.GA21568@havoc.gtf.org> <17736.43507.649685.484648@smtp.charter.net> <1162391435.11965.128.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061101160207.6b5e4c29.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:50844 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752622AbWKBBGL (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:06:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20061101160207.6b5e4c29.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Alan Cox , John Stoffel , Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:30:35 +0000 > Alan Cox wrote: > >> Ar Mer, 2006-11-01 am 09:06 -0500, ysgrifennodd John Stoffel: >>> Jeff> + { 0x8086, 0x7110, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, piix_pata_33 }, >>> Jeff> { 0x8086, 0x7111, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, piix_pata_33 }, >>> >>> Umm, according to lspci -nn on my 440GX box, isn't the 0x8086/0x7110 >>> an ISA bridge, not a PIIX? controller? >> Correct - the 7110 doesn't belong on that list. > > So should it be moved elsewhere, or simply removed? Well, according to Jens' own comment message, the PCI ID he needed was already in the driver (my eyes didn't catch this). It looks like it should be reverted, based on this thread and also the patch's commit message itself. Jeff