From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/7] net/ipv6: Fix route append and replace use cases Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 23:54:08 -0600 Message-ID: <458fe36b-355a-f11e-32b4-8a139c26a298@gmail.com> References: <20180515025112.16647-1-dsahern@gmail.com> <20180515052104.GA10152@eros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz, idosch@mellanox.com, sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com To: "Tobin C. Harding" Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:39532 "EHLO mail-pf0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbeEOFyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2018 01:54:16 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id a22-v6so7156926pfn.6 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 22:54:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180515052104.GA10152@eros> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/14/18 11:21 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Hi David, > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 07:51:05PM -0700, David Ahern wrote: >> This patch set fixes a few append and replace uses cases for IPv6 and >> adds test cases that codifies the expectations of how append and replace >> are expected to work. > > Nood question: what commit does this apply on top of please. I > attempted to apply the set on top of net-next > > commit (961423f9fcbc Merge branch 'sctp-Introduce-sctp_flush_ctx') > > patch 4 and 5 have merge conflicts (I stopped at 5). Base commit is: commit 289e1f4e9e4a09c73a1c0152bb93855ea351ccda Author: Anders Roxell Date: Sun May 13 21:48:30 2018 +0200 net: ipv4: ipconfig: fix unused variable I don't see 961423f9fcbc in any tree.