From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.111.4.28] (helo=out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H9bp3-0000IM-M8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:41:29 +0100 Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0870A944E1 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:41:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:41:29 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: /Sr1Yb7V21HgbSc+0HEuD8oEh6Di4MCPXkloldFS32vk 1169620888 Received: from [192.168.76.11] (secure.astc-design.com [203.122.250.137]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463AE292FB for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:41:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45B6FF94.8050500@whitby.id.au> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:11:24 +1030 From: Rod Whitby User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <45B40165.6000506@whitby.id.au> <45B4EDCD.1060609@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <45B50D16.8060001@whitby.id.au> <45B518A5.8000500@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <45B5528F.3050108@whitby.id.au> <1169550792.5845.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45B663F8.5030901@whitby.id.au> <1169584472.5845.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1169584472.5845.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Subject: SITEINFO_ENDIAN(N)ESS (NN, not N) X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 06:41:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 06:07 +1030, Rod Whitby wrote: >> Are you referring to the existing SITEINFO_ENDIANESS (sic) variable >> (which I only just found ...) ? > > Yes. Shouldn't it be spelled SITEINFO_ENDIANNESS? (i.e. double N) (Both Google and Wikipedia say that it is endianness, not endianess) Anyone object to me changing the 4 places it's currently used, before I use it in 73 new places? -- Rod