From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Funny Routing change since 2.6.16.x Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:32:24 +0100 Message-ID: <45CB5098.3020107@trash.net> References: <200702071756.34409.netdev@axxeo.de> <200702071816.28235.netdev@axxeo.de> <45CA09F2.6050700@trash.net> <200702081652.31527.netdev@axxeo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Oeser Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:44957 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423129AbXBHQc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:32:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200702081652.31527.netdev@axxeo.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ingo Oeser wrote: > Patrick McHardy schrieb: > >>Since these packets already have the proper source address chosen >>by routing, there is no need to NAT them anymore. So the easiest >>fix is to exclude them manually from masquerading based on the >>address. > > > Just did that (iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s $SRCADDR -o ppp0 -j ACCEPT) > and it works without any problems. > > Many thanks for your very fast help! I'm very happy now :-) > > Do you know any good place, where this can be documented? We have a netfilter Wiki now at wiki.netfilter.org. You could add the first entry :)