From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945965AbXBIA6U (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:58:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1945966AbXBIA6U (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:58:20 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([216.148.227.151]:36989 "EHLO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945965AbXBIA6T (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:58:19 -0500 Message-ID: <45CBC71F.30607@ubiqx.mn.org> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:58:07 -0600 From: "Christopher R. Hertel" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shirish S Pargaonkar CC: Jan Engelhardt , Steve French , linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, linux-cifs-client-bounces+shirishp=us.ibm.com@lists.samba.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: SMB support still missing? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shirish S Pargaonkar wrote: : > This is what Steve had mailed me once, a while ago.... > > Win9x and Windows ME and OS/2 only listen on port 139 > > WindowsNT 4 (?) and later listen on port 445 and port 139. > > When you connect on the older port 139, you are supposed to send a > RFC1001 (NBSS Session Request to indicate your client netbios name, but > the problem is that you don't know the target netbios name of the server > - which is why the either needs to support the fake name "*SMBSERVER" or > the client needs to specify the "servernetbiosname=" option on > mount to identify which name on the server to try to connect to. > > So > 1) try tcp connection on 445, > then if it works send SMB negprot > 2) else try tcp connection on port 139 > then if it works send nbss request to *SMBSERVER or to the name > specified on servernetbiosname > (cifs really should do an ASTAT command and list the valid names and > find one if that approach fails but we don't have code for this yet) This is all correct, and also note that W/9x systems do not support the "*SMBSERVER" name. On the other hand, the name was resolved somehow. The typical work-arounds to not knowning the NBT name of the server are: 1) Use the name you just resolved (in this case, "CL0"). 2) Send a Node Status Query and look for the first unique <20> name. The second (as Steve explained to me a long time ago) is less reliable because there are some applications out there which (incorrectly) register names with a suffix byte of <20>. Chris -)----- -- "Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh@ubiqx.mn.org OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh@ubiqx.org