From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HGIhn-00066c-7l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:41:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HGIhl-00065Z-Ja
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:41:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HGIhl-00065S-Da
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:41:37 -0500
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.224])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HGIhl-00055c-4p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:41:37 -0500
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i11so2352928nzi
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:41:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45CF554C.8070805@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:41:32 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Remove bash-ism from configure
References: <45CE7A08.9090601@codemonkey.ws>
	<Pine.LNX.4.63.0702111737300.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702111737300.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>   
>> This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect.  It's against CVS 
>> from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
>>     
>
> AFAICT "which" is not really portable, either. But then, I always have a 
> bash, so I really don't care.
>   

On my system, which is an executable, not a shell command so it's 
outside the scope of bashism.  It's also used elsewhere within configure.

We claim to use /bin/sh so we should not be using bashism.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
>
>