From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964917AbXBLNtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:49:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964919AbXBLNtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:49:41 -0500 Received: from 85.8.24.16.se.wasadata.net ([85.8.24.16]:43163 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964917AbXBLNtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:49:41 -0500 Message-ID: <45D07075.7090302@drzeus.cx> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:49:41 +0100 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dubov CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Recent and not-so problems with tifm_sd driver References: <20070212115343.41523.qmail@web36712.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20070212115343.41523.qmail@web36712.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alex Dubov wrote: > I removed that line altogether (it does not really needed as mmc host will not be accessed > anymore). The problem is more elaborate. Here, the card fails, mmc_host_remove is called without > sleep beforehand, and "after remove" message is printed immediately after it. Only then, mmc_block > remembers to finish its business. If I leave the sleep in place, mmc_block's stuff will get > scheduled before the mmc_remove_host and everything will be all right. > You may also notice that host is already powered off ("Setting ... power 0" message) and still > mmc_block continues to make requests like nothing happened. > How did you do the "after remove" detection? Patch? Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org