From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net (de01egw02.freescale.net [192.88.165.103]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F2ADDE16 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:45:41 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <45D09993.9050903@freescale.com> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:45:07 -0600 From: Scott Wood MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mark A. Greer" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/19] bootwrapper: Add xlate_reg(), and use it to find serial registers. References: <20070207230017.GA3758@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070207230145.GR3849@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> <20070209230700.GC12035@mag.az.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <20070209230700.GC12035@mag.az.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Mark A. Greer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:01:45PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > >>xlate_reg() uses the ranges properties of a node's parentage to find the >>absolute physical address of the node's registers. >> >>The ns16550 driver uses this when no virtual-reg property is found. > > > Is this necessary? Shouldn't there always be a virtual-reg? None of the dts files in the kernel tree currently have such a property... -Scott