From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_via: fix resource-managed iomap conversion Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:10:08 -0800 Message-ID: <45D0C9A0.1030707@gmail.com> References: <20070210010914.GA19717@havoc.gtf.org> <20070210054629.GA4395@gentoox2.trippelsdorf.de> <45CF93D1.9080009@gmail.com> <20070212025843.GA4406@gentoox2.trippelsdorf.de> <45D0B740.9050704@gmail.com> <20070212193302.GA5003@gentoox2.trippelsdorf.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:14957 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965287AbXBLUKS (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:10:18 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so900466pyi for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:10:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070212193302.GA5003@gentoox2.trippelsdorf.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Markus Trippelsdorf Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, LKML Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:51:44AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Conversion to resource-managed iomap was buggy causing init failures >> on both vt6420 and 6421 - BAR5 wasn't mapped for both controllers >> while on vt6420 sata_via tried to map BAR0-4 twice. Fix it. Great, can anyone verify this on vt6421? -- tejun