From: Larry Finger <email@example.com> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: wireless <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Michael Buesch <email@example.com>, John Linville <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:18:44 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <45D0F5D4.email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote: >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote: >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> It doesn't help in my case. The behavior is similar to that without the patch, >>>>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely. >>>> Thanks for trying. >>>> >>>> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 200. >>> Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ... >> Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to respond. >> >>> I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware. Where exactly is it >>> stored? >> In the memory of the microprocessor on the card. >> >> Please do what I asked. > > With or without the previous patch? With the change to BCM43xx_IRQWAIT_MAX_RETRIES, but not the one that tries to reload the firmware. Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-12 23:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-02-09 16:18 Larry Finger 2007-02-09 16:18 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-09 16:53 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-09 16:53 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-10 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-10 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-10 20:33 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-11 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 13:07 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 14:14 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 14:41 ` Johannes Berg 2007-02-11 14:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-11 14:48 ` Johannes Berg 2007-02-11 15:59 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-11 16:03 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 16:16 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-11 16:17 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 0:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 1:18 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 22:20 ` Larry Finger 2007-02-12 23:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2007-02-12 23:18 ` Larry Finger [this message] 2007-02-12 23:24 ` Michael Buesch 2007-02-13 16:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=45D0F5D4.email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.