From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1KJfQUv009662 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:41:26 -0500 Received: from tcsfw4.tcs-sec.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l1KJgfQc018198 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:42:42 GMT Message-ID: <45DB4F07.9040607@trustedcs.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:41:59 -0600 From: Darrel Goeddel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Klaus Weidner CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , Daniel J Walsh , Karl MacMillan , SE Linux Subject: Re: Latest diffs - Resent with additional changes. References: <45B8ACBF.8090201@redhat.com> <1171663101.20576.147.camel@sgc.columbia.tresys.com> <20070219031951.GA9827@w-m-p.com> In-Reply-To: <20070219031951.GA9827@w-m-p.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Klaus Weidner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:58:21PM -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 08:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> The MLS constraints are really screwed up. Need to come to some kind of >>> agreement between you, klaus and tcs. >> I'm not familiar with the LSPP requirements, so its mainly up to Klaus >> and the TCS guys to iron out what makes sense. > > I haven't heard back from TCS about their opinion on this. I would > suggest using the constraints as in Dan's policy (and as used in the > RHEL5 rc) since those are designed to meet LSPP requirements. We (TCS) are checking out the changes now. -- Darrel -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.