From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, edmudama@gmail.com,
Nicolas.Mailhot@LaPoste.net, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>,
Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>, Dongjun Shin <d.j.shin@samsung.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: libata FUA revisited
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:06:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45DC51CF.7090202@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45DC04DF.8040002@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Aside from the issue above, as I mentioned elsewhere, lots of NCQ drives
>> don't support non-NCQ FUA writes..
>
> To me, using the NCQ FUA bit on such drives doesn't seem to be a good
> idea. Maybe I'm just too chicken but it's not like we can gain a lot
> from doing FUA at this point. Are there a lot of drives which support
> NCQ but not FUA opcodes?
Well, it's hard to say whether "lots" have this issue, but the ones I
have in my machine, Seagate 7200.7 NCQ 160GB (ST3160827AS) and 7200.10
320GB (ST3320620AS), both support NCQ and don't support non-NCQ FUA, and
those (especially the latter) seem to be very popular models.
Likely Seagate didn't implement that command since they figured nobody
would use that if they had NCQ..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.S80SRyQbD/hm4SxliPUKU88BaCo@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-12 5:47 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] ` <fa.Q/csgyCHkAsD84yi+bN78H1WNNM@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-13 0:23 ` Robert Hancock
2007-02-13 15:20 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-14 0:07 ` Robert Hancock
2007-02-14 0:50 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-15 18:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-19 19:46 ` Robert Hancock
2007-02-21 8:37 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-21 8:46 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-21 8:57 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-21 9:01 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-22 22:44 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-22 22:40 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-21 14:06 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2007-02-22 22:34 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-23 0:04 ` Robert Hancock
2007-02-21 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2007-02-12 3:25 Robert Hancock
2007-02-12 8:31 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-16 18:14 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45DC51CF.7090202@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=Nicolas.Mailhot@LaPoste.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=d.j.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=edmudama@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=ric@emc.com \
--subject='Re: libata FUA revisited' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.