From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <timur@freescale.com>
Message-ID: <45E5FB91.5090007@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:00:49 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@mvista.com>, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: Time to put bootwrapper patches into powerpc.git?
References: <20070216203134.GB26099@mag.az.mvista.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070216203134.GB26099@mag.az.mvista.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Mark A. Greer wrote:
> There is a rather large number of patches for the bootwrapper (from
> Scott Wood, David Gibson, others?) queued up to go into powerpc.git.
> I think most of them are acceptable or pretty close so IMHO it would be
> nice to have them in powerpc.git.  Especially since I have more patches
> for the bootwrapper and I don't know what I should base them on. :)
> 
> Anyone agree?

Yes, I think these patches are long overdue.

Paul, do you see any reason why these patches can't become part of 2.6.21?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale