From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06254C282E0 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 21:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C063421736 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 21:03:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1555707791; bh=58oPZUXjhRkw7XY+ljE3W49BNutBG0Z7wXR2Np07/u8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=KXXnn9uKsdk68tyXoy9u5VQEoOTshP1GxUJmfP1M0zjEagJBackb6lXc8EKuAlJhD +dWVN5m7A1jtunIxydpVBgE5pUVFSw5SH+ZlSnmwwwE4VP0OEGtjbvQ/sC2JvR6Vu+ Be052g7AwQU2X9iMaRJJehiToBcxXTpsuqbtTQMo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727607AbfDSVDK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:03:10 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38868 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726000AbfDSVDK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:03:10 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (c-24-9-64-241.hsd1.co.comcast.net [24.9.64.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEF692171F; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 21:03:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1555707789; bh=58oPZUXjhRkw7XY+ljE3W49BNutBG0Z7wXR2Np07/u8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=C/bHvNaHcIXeWTwuL4x1cs1/7dBlY4x29liDaN4LHtUSDwBkqLePe1fjMRyPC902Z QcPnNI/CHYJAbns+AYhpf3gHKMV4LkxxpMhvkhYOdbCvQlAw1aTYZyo6IcG3kIIdeg DnZ/rdq1r9fBVfBhj7uYsxuSOvABq7i/OUZpeur0= Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel , linux-api , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Michael Kerrisk , Joel Fernandes , linux-kselftest , shuah References: <20190305194755.2602-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1444419838.71.1555677682502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1266612341.87.1555678507226.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <614774674.134.1555681346941.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1863599735.141.1555681723685.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <6ba0796c-8a96-f797-265c-37bfb9b4bb71@kernel.org> <580328197.148.1555684824260.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> From: shuah Message-ID: <45ecf26a-a2f4-fa86-a252-e1d9b3bc4224@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:03:06 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/19/19 2:59 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:57 PM, shuah shuah@kernel.org wrote: > [...] >> Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just >> confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this >> one or not? > > We should keep this patch in linux-kselftest next. The fix applies on top > of it. > Will do. Thanks for a quick response. -- Shuah From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shuah at kernel.org (shuah) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:03:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus In-Reply-To: <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20190305194755.2602-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1444419838.71.1555677682502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1266612341.87.1555678507226.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <614774674.134.1555681346941.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1863599735.141.1555681723685.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <6ba0796c-8a96-f797-265c-37bfb9b4bb71@kernel.org> <580328197.148.1555684824260.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Message-ID: <45ecf26a-a2f4-fa86-a252-e1d9b3bc4224@kernel.org> On 4/19/19 2:59 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:57 PM, shuah shuah at kernel.org wrote: > [...] >> Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just >> confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this >> one or not? > > We should keep this patch in linux-kselftest next. The fix applies on top > of it. > Will do. Thanks for a quick response. -- Shuah From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shuah@kernel.org (shuah) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:03:06 -0600 Subject: [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus In-Reply-To: <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> References: <20190305194755.2602-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1444419838.71.1555677682502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1266612341.87.1555678507226.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <614774674.134.1555681346941.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1863599735.141.1555681723685.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <6ba0796c-8a96-f797-265c-37bfb9b4bb71@kernel.org> <580328197.148.1555684824260.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Message-ID: <45ecf26a-a2f4-fa86-a252-e1d9b3bc4224@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190419210306.FkhQNFrI3FBA9VIQBGYNlHkaMepniK3pQqeb_prn2Sw@z> On 4/19/19 2:59 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Apr 19, 2019,@2:57 PM, shuah shuah@kernel.org wrote: > [...] >> Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just >> confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this >> one or not? > > We should keep this patch in linux-kselftest next. The fix applies on top > of it. > Will do. Thanks for a quick response. -- Shuah From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shuah Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 15:03:06 -0600 Message-ID: <45ecf26a-a2f4-fa86-a252-e1d9b3bc4224@kernel.org> References: <20190305194755.2602-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <1444419838.71.1555677682502.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1266612341.87.1555678507226.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <614774674.134.1555681346941.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1863599735.141.1555681723685.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <6ba0796c-8a96-f797-265c-37bfb9b4bb71@kernel.org> <580328197.148.1555684824260.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1136505826.203.1555707541777.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel , linux-api , Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E . McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Watson , Paul Turner , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Chris Lameter , Ben Maurer , rostedt , Josh Triplett , Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 4/19/19 2:59 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:57 PM, shuah shuah@kernel.org wrote: > [...] >> Should I drop this patch that is currently in linux-kseltest next? Just >> confirming if your new patch is supposed to be applied on top of this >> one or not? > > We should keep this patch in linux-kselftest next. The fix applies on top > of it. > Will do. Thanks for a quick response. -- Shuah