From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964974AbXCUVLg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:11:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964983AbXCUVLg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:11:36 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:38613 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964974AbXCUVLf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:11:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vdHFOdjtXMCPD+mg7p735FWaK6RR78JVDaw88Tz3VNVCbKdEb4NQ0BsAoHHij2FkT UgEr5cj5Bry0X/A92Qgtg== Message-ID: <46019F67.3010300@google.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:11:03 -0700 From: Ethan Solomita User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: akpm@osdl.org, Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Paul Jackson , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback References: <20070116054743.15358.77287.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <45C2960B.9070907@google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > >> Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns that >> Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some >> progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through. > > Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as > soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit. I'm pinging to see if this has gotten anywhere. Are you ready to resubmit? Do we have the evidence to convince Andrew that the NFS issues are resolved and so this patch won't obscure anything? Thanks, -- Ethan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46019F67.3010300@google.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:11:03 -0700 From: Ethan Solomita MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Cpuset aware writeback References: <20070116054743.15358.77287.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <45C2960B.9070907@google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Paul Menage , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Paul Jackson , Dave Chinner List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Ethan Solomita wrote: > >> Hi Christoph -- has anything come of resolving the NFS / OOM concerns that >> Andrew Morton expressed concerning the patch? I'd be happy to see some >> progress on getting this patch (i.e. the one you posted on 1/23) through. > > Peter Zilkstra addressed the NFS issue. I will submit the patch again as > soon as the writeback code stabilizes a bit. I'm pinging to see if this has gotten anywhere. Are you ready to resubmit? Do we have the evidence to convince Andrew that the NFS issues are resolved and so this patch won't obscure anything? Thanks, -- Ethan -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org