From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965233AbXC0HAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:00:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965268AbXC0HAz (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:00:55 -0400 Received: from sp604005mt.neufgp.fr ([84.96.92.11]:34215 "EHLO smtp.Neuf.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965233AbXC0HAy (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:00:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:00:49 +0200 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog In-reply-to: <20070327054106.664262413@goop.org> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , Zachary Amsden , James Morris , Dan Hecht , Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Prarit Bhargava , Chris Lalancette , Rick Lindsley Message-id: <4608C121.4050309@cosmosbay.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <20070327053816.881735237@goop.org> <20070327054106.664262413@goop.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeremy Fitzhardinge a écrit : > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, touch_timestamp); ... > void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void) > { > - __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = jiffies; > + __raw_get_cpu_var(touch_timestamp) = sched_clock(); > } Not very clear if this is safe on 32bit, since this is not anymore atomic. Maybe a comment would help ?