From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261675AbUKIUKy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:10:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261673AbUKIUKy (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:10:54 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:17285 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261675AbUKIUKu (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:10:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:09:52 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Hugh Dickins , Brent Casavant cc: Andi Kleen , "Adam J. Richter" , colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files Message-ID: <463220000.1100030992@flay> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I think the option should be "mpol=interleave" rather than just > "interleave", who knows what baroque mpols we might want to support > there in future? Sounds sensible. > I'm irritated to realize that we can't change the default for SysV > shared memory or /dev/zero this way, because that mount is internal. Boggle. shmem I can perfectly understand, and have been intending to change for a while. But why /dev/zero ? Presumably you'd always want that local? Thanks, M. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:09:52 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files Message-ID: <463220000.1100030992@flay> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hugh Dickins , Brent Casavant Cc: Andi Kleen , "Adam J. Richter" , colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > I think the option should be "mpol=interleave" rather than just > "interleave", who knows what baroque mpols we might want to support > there in future? Sounds sensible. > I'm irritated to realize that we can't change the default for SysV > shared memory or /dev/zero this way, because that mount is internal. Boggle. shmem I can perfectly understand, and have been intending to change for a while. But why /dev/zero ? Presumably you'd always want that local? Thanks, M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org