From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: smp_affinity, MSI-X and 2.6.21.1 Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:09:58 -0700 Message-ID: <463FBFD6.7070301@hp.com> References: <463F91D3.3010000@hp.com> <1178579220.3819.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Network Development list To: Arjan van de Ven Return-path: Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:55914 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967457AbXEHAKC (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 20:10:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1178579220.3819.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:53 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > >>Folks - >> >>Is it a bug, or a feature that after changing a device's smp_affinity via echo >>"N" >> /proc/irq/M/smp_affinity that the new mask isn't visible via cat >>/proc/irq/M/smp_affinity until after actual interrupts are taken?\ > > > that's known and expected behavior well, expected by those in the know anyway :) thanks. rick jones