From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: protect exclusive_operation by super_lock
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:37:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46481e34-958c-c055-a23a-45ded5cf4097@toxicpanda.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27c5165b8de26ab98948c0345de3f8ddd955c388.1621526221.git.dsterba@suse.com>
On 5/21/21 8:06 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> The exclusive operation is now atomically checked and set using bit
> operations. Switch it to protection by spinlock. The super block lock is
> not frequently used and adding a new lock seems like an overkill so it
> should be safe to reuse it.
>
> The reason to use spinlock is to enhance the locking context so more
> checks can be done, eg. allowing the same exclusive operation enter
> the exclop section and cancel the running one. This will be used for
> resize and device delete.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 12:06 [PATCH 0/6] Support resize and device delete cancel ops David Sterba
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: protect exclusive_operation by super_lock David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:37 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] btrfs: add cancelable chunk relocation support David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:21 ` Josef Bacik
2021-05-26 22:56 ` David Sterba
2021-06-16 13:54 ` Filipe Manana
2021-06-16 13:55 ` Filipe Manana
2021-06-16 15:53 ` David Sterba
2021-06-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v2] btrfs: add cancellable " David Sterba
2021-06-17 9:18 ` Filipe Manana
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] btrfs: introduce try-lock semantics for exclusive op start David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:38 ` Josef Bacik
2021-05-27 7:43 ` Anand Jain
2021-05-28 12:30 ` David Sterba
2021-05-29 13:48 ` Anand Jain
2021-05-31 18:23 ` David Sterba
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] btrfs: add wrapper for conditional start of exclusive operation David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:29 ` Josef Bacik
2021-05-21 16:45 ` David Sterba
2021-05-26 22:24 ` David Sterba
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] btrfs: add cancelation to resize David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:38 ` Josef Bacik
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] btrfs: add device delete cancel David Sterba
2021-05-21 13:38 ` Josef Bacik
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs-progs: device remove: add support for cancel David Sterba
2021-05-21 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: fi resize: " David Sterba
2021-12-14 14:49 ` [PATCH 0/6] Support resize and device delete cancel ops Anand Jain
2021-12-15 15:13 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46481e34-958c-c055-a23a-45ded5cf4097@toxicpanda.com \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--subject='Re: [PATCH 1/6] btrfs: protect exclusive_operation by super_lock' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.